The Supreme Court says Manhattan DA may get Trump's tax records, but rejects proposal from House Democrats

The Supreme Court says Manhattan DA may get Trump's tax records, but rejects proposal from House Democrats
On Thursday, the Supreme Court issued a divided opinion in two cases over whether President Donald Trump could protect his tax record from investigators by handing a victory to the Manhattan district attorney, but rejected parallel efforts by Democrats in the House of Representatives.

Both cases were decided 7–2, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking the opinion of the court, and mostly consisting of justices Ruth Beder Zinsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Breta Kwanuag and Neil Gorsuch. Judges Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito disagreed in both cases.

Both cases are subject to further review by lower courts. The judges rejected the president's claims that he was immune to the state's criminal citations in the Vance case. In the case of Congress, he wiped out rallies in favor of the Democrats in the House of Representatives, ordering the lower courts to consider concerns about the separation of powers.

Mixed decisions mean the American public is unlikely to know about Trump's financial records or tax information before the November election.

The verdict marks the first time that the nation's highest court has ruled a case directly related to Trump's personal behavior. Trump has been more reserved with his finances than any other president for decades, while refusing to make his tax records public even when running for reunification.

The cases were decided on the last day of the Supreme Court's mandate, which began last October and proceeded from its specific conclusion in late June as a result of precautions taken against the spread of coronovirus.

Roberts wrote in the New York case, "In our judicial system, 'the public has the right to the evidence of every man.' Since the early days of the Republic, 'every man' has included the President of the United States. "

This case is Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance Jr. An investigation by Vance stems from a sub-statement issued to Trump's accounting firm, Mazars, for a wide variety of Trump's personal and business records, including statements. Kara, dating back to 2011.

Vance's office is investigating the silence payments that Trump allegedly provided to the two women before the 2016 election, although the purpose of his Uppenas is relatively unclear.

The women claim that they had sexual relations with the president. Vance has not said whether Trump is a suspect in his investigation, and has not indicated any possible charges.

Trump's attorneys have advocated for a broader view of the president's immunity to the case.

During a court hearing for the first time in New York, an attorney for the president said that, in theory, Trump would be immune to the investigation, even if he shot someone on New York's Fifth Avenue. During the 2016 campaign, Trump claimed that he could "stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot anyone and he wouldn't lose any voters."

Vance, in a statement, described Thursday's decision as "a tremendous victory for our nation's justice system and its fundamental principle that no president is above the law."

"Our investigation, which was delayed by this trial by about a year, will be directed as always to the grand jury's obligation to follow the law and the facts, wherever they lead."

Congressional matters included the subpoena issued by Democrat-led committees in the House of Representatives that sought financial records from the tomb, as well as its banks, Capital One and Deutsche Bank.

"This case is different," Roberts wrote in an opinion release Thursday. "Presidential information here is not sought by prosecutors or private parties in relation to any particular judicial proceeding, but broad legislative goals have been set by congressional committees."

Roberts wrote, "Congress and the president, the two political branches established by the constitution, are a continuing relationship that the Framers intend to introduce both rivalry and reciprocity."

The House of Representatives Oversight Committee sought information in connection with an investigation into claims made by attorneys for former President Michael Cohen that Trump instigated and defended their properties to meet their needs.

The oversight panel is also investigating the fact that Trump has not disclosed the $ 130,000 silent payment he owes to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in his 2017 disclosure form. The Government Ethics Office has stated. Trump should list the debt, which he lists as a liability on Cohen, to facilitate repayment.

The Financial Services and Intelligence Committees issued two separate subdivisions to Deutsche Bank to provide information about the president and his family members, including his sons Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump and Ivanka Trump. A third subpoena of the Financial Services Committee asked Trump One for detailed information on 15 Trump businesses.

The Financial Services Committee is investigating possible foreign money laundering. Representative Adam Schiff, chairman of the Intelligence Committee, said his committee's investigation included finding out whether "a foreign actor has attempted to exert financial or other influence on Donald Trump, his family, his company or his company" Companion. "

The lower courts in New York and Washington confirmed Uppen, but the president asked judges to reverse those rulings.

Congressional Consolidated Cases of Trump Vs. Majors, Nos. 19-715 and Trump v. Deutsche Bank, No. 19–760. New York case Trump Vs. Vans, Nos. 19–635.

Post a Comment

0 Comments